University of Chicago Press
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: And Three Brief Essays
Regular price
$7.95 USD
Regular price
Sale price
$7.95 USD
Unit price
per
Shipping calculated at checkout.
Couldn't load pickup availability
Title: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: And Three Brief Essays
Author: James Fitzjames Stephen
Political Science: 1721526
ISBN: 9780226772585
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Published: 1992
Binding: Paperback
Language: English
Edition: Reprint edition
Number of Pages: 312
Condition Note: Excellent, unmarked copy with little wear and tight binding. We ship in recyclable American-made mailers. 100% money-back guarantee on all orders.
Publisher Description: With great energy and clarity, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (1829-1894), author of History of the Criminal Law of England, and judge of the High Court from 1879-91, challenges John Stuart Mill's On Liberty and On Utilitarianism, arguing that Mill's view of humanity is sentimental and utopian. "His writing is strong meat-full of the threat of hellfrire, the virtue of government by the lash and a fervent belief that the state cannot remain neutral but has a duty to espouse a moral code."-Roderick Munday, Cambridge Law Journal
Author: James Fitzjames Stephen
Political Science: 1721526
ISBN: 9780226772585
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Published: 1992
Binding: Paperback
Language: English
Edition: Reprint edition
Number of Pages: 312
Condition Note: Excellent, unmarked copy with little wear and tight binding. We ship in recyclable American-made mailers. 100% money-back guarantee on all orders.
Publisher Description: With great energy and clarity, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (1829-1894), author of History of the Criminal Law of England, and judge of the High Court from 1879-91, challenges John Stuart Mill's On Liberty and On Utilitarianism, arguing that Mill's view of humanity is sentimental and utopian. "His writing is strong meat-full of the threat of hellfrire, the virtue of government by the lash and a fervent belief that the state cannot remain neutral but has a duty to espouse a moral code."-Roderick Munday, Cambridge Law Journal
